John Young Architect


Preservation News, National Trust for Historic Preservation, May, 1971



Industrial District Near Great Falls, N.J. Threatened by Construction of Highway


Print of the Great Falls. c. 1865. shows iron arched-truss "Old Falls Bridge'' (c. 1850), a water pumping station at center rear and a former resort inn. (Reid Collection)




In Paterson. NJ., conservation and preservation interests have fused in an effort to save and rehabilitate the Great Falls/SUM Historic District, threatened by decay, apathy and a proposed highway. The district includes the Great Falls of the Passaic River (a major 19th-century tourist attraction) and an extensive group of important industrial structures.

Attention was first centered on the area when citizens applied to have the Falls designated a National Natural Landmark. The designation was approved in 1967. Interest in cleaning up the polluted Passaic River and developing an open space area around the Great Falls has continued.

On the advice of experts, supporters of the project included in their plans preservation of the surrounding industrial district, which developed after the Society for Establishing Useful Manufactures (SUM) located in Paterson in 1792. The Society was the first American experiment in large scale manufacturing on a single site. In use ever since, the area illustrates the growth and changes in industrial planning, engineering and architecture that occurred from 1793 to 1912.

Listed in Register

Significant structures include the Rogers Locomotive Works and the remains of Samuel Colt's armory (1835), where the Colt revolver was first manufactured. In addition to 60 other structures, the district includes three millraces, one engineered by Pierre Charles L'Enfant; two dams and several historic bridges. In April 1970, the Great Falls/ SUM Historic District was added to the National Register.

The Great Falls Project Committee, led by Mrs. Mary Ellen Kramer, wife of Paterson's mayor, has been assisted in developing a plan for the area by Urban Deadline Architects of New York City. The group maintains that preservation of the historic industrial district is of vital importance to the city's entire business area.




Drawing of proposed development of the Falls area. The building at left is the SUM electric generating plant (1912-14), built to provide a power source for the SUM industries.  (Urban Deadline Architects)



Key to Past

This area, they say. is also the key to understanding an important characteristic of Paterson. Traditionally industrial, Paterson continues to be chiefly a place to work. But the stereotype of a grimy, blighted milltown has dimmed the city's earlier reputation for growth and pragmatism. The committee hopes to renew civic pride and reaffirm the old image of the city by halting the spread of blight within the historic district and again making the area a viable economic resource.

Consultants from the Historic American Buildings Survey. the National Trust and the Smithsonian Institution have confirmed the historical and architectural value of the area and given their support to the project.

Highway Divisive

The situation is complicated by the imminent construction of Route 20. Straddling the project area, the highway would take a number of the historic structures and cut off the remaining portions of the area from the city.

The project committee, the mayor of Paterson and other city agencies have been negotiating with the design department of the state Department of Transportation to modify the proposed design of the highway. The state is unwilling to do this unless the city agrees to bear all increased costs occasioned by the delay. Although alternative designs have been considered, none changes radically the main alignment of the highway through the core of the historic area.

Since federal highway funds are involved, the project is being studied informally by the office of the National Register to avoid review by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. Such action is required under Section 106 of the Historic Preservation Act of 1966.


Back to JYA Bibliography